Minimally invasive sinus surgery.
SKU: 81056049166

Minimally invasive sinus surgery.

$112.50 $125.00
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on alleghenybetterhealth.org >

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 9 - Jul 14

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Minimally invasive sinus surgery.Minimally Invasive Sinus Surgery New Implant Treatment Protocols for the Posterior Maxilla * Language : English * Author and Editor : Young Ku Heo, DDS, MSD, PhD * Co Authors Richard Leesungbok, DMD, MSD, PhD Jung Chul Park, DDS, MSD, PhD Nam Yoon Michael Kim, DDS, MSD, PhD Jongyub Kim, DDS, MS, CAGS, PhD Chonghwa Kim, DDS, MS, FICD Joongmin Kim, DDS, MS, PhD Hyun Chang Lim, DDS, MSD, PhD Chapter 1 Understanding the Posterior Maxilla Jung Chul Park,

Minimally Invasive Sinus Surgery

New Implant Treatment Protocols for the Posterior Maxilla

* Language : English

* Author and Editor : Young-Ku Heo, DDS, MSD, PhD

* Co-Authors

Richard Leesungbok, DMD, MSD, PhD

Jung-Chul Park, DDS, MSD, PhD

Nam Yoon Michael Kim, DDS, MSD, PhD

Jongyub Kim, DDS, MS, CAGS, PhD

Chonghwa Kim, DDS, MS, FICD

Joongmin Kim, DDS, MS, PhD

Hyun-Chang Lim, DDS, MSD, PhD



| Chapter 1 | Understanding the Posterior Maxilla / Jung-Chul Park, Hyun-Chang Lim

Introduction / 2
Anatomy of the posterior maxilla / 3
Conventional sinus lift techniques / 15


| Chapter 2 | CMI Fixation: Types of Implant Fixation / Young-Ku Heo, Richard LEESUNGBOK

Conventional bone density classi cation / 26
Heo’s bone density classi cation / 28
CMI xation / 29
Charting methods of the CMI xation / 36


| Chapter 3 | Heo's Sinus CMI Classification / Young-Ku Heo

Heo's classi cation of Sinus CMI xation / 43
Sinus Class I CMI xation / 44
Sinus Class II CMI xation / 48
Sinus Class III CM/C xation / 56
Sinus Class IV CM/C xation / 56


| Chapter 4 | The SCA Technique: A New Sinus Crestal Approach Technique / Young-Ku Heo

New approach to achieve xation in the inferior cortical wall of the sinus / 60
The SCA technique / 61
Step by step procedure of the SCA technique / 74
Key factors for minimizing membrane tearing / 79


| Chapter 5 | Clinical Cases of the SCA Technique

Case 1: 8 Year follow-up case of Class III CMI/CM xation in the maxillary 1st and 2nd molar area / Jongyub Kim / 84
Case 2: Single tooth restoration with a Ti customized abutment supported by an implant with Class III CMI xation in the maxillary 1st molar area / Richard LEESUNGBOK / 88
Case 3: Delayed immediate placement with Class III M fixation using the SCA technique in the extraction socket of the maxillary left 1st molar/ Chonghwa Kim / 92
Case 4: Maxillary posterior multiple teeth replacement with Class I, II, and III CMI fixations / Young-Ku Heo / 95
Case 5: 10mm sinus lifting with the SCA technique in the severely concave sinus floor / Young-Ku Heo / 101
Case 6: 6 year result of a 7mm sinus elevation with the crestal approach utilizing micro-elevators / Jongyub Kim / 107
Case 7: Immediate placement with the crestal sinus elevation in limited available bone height/ Jung-Chul Park / 112
Case 8: 7 year long-term result of immediate placement with crestal sinus elevation/ Joongmin Kim / 116
Case 9: Class III M xation with sinus crestal elevation and GBR with a Ti mesh / Nam Yoon Michael Kim / 121
Class 10: 6 year result of simultaneous implant placement after sinus elevation through the crestal approach with the microelevators in the thin residual bone height/ Young-Ku Heo / 128
Case 11: Crestal and lateral sinus elevation with SCA and SLA techniques / Young-Ku Heo / 133


| Chapter 6 | The SLA Technique: A New Sinus Lateral Approach Technique / Young-Ku Heo

Conventional lateral window technique / 144
The SLA technique / 146
Basic procedures of the SLA technique with simultaneous implant placement / 162
Advantages of the SLA technique / 164
Complications and management / 173


| Chapter 7 | Clinical Cases of the SLA Technique

Case 1: 8-year result of a lateral window opening using a LS-reamer with a semilunar ap / Nam Yoon Michael Kim / 186
Case 2: 8-year result of a lateral window opening using an LS-reamer with a small vertical incision/ Young-Ku Heo / 191
Case 3: CMI implant surgery with SCA and SLA on the posterior maxilla / Richard LEESUNGBOK / 196
Case 4: Sinus Class III CM and Class IV CM/C xations with SCA and SLA techniques / Jongyub Kim / 204
Case 5: Immediate placement with SLA technique and small vertical incision / Chonghwa Kim / 212
Case 6: Simultaneous implant placement with C-reamer and full thickness ap: 5 year follow-up / Joongmin Kim / 218
Case 7: Immediate placement with sinus Class IV CM/C xation using SLA technique / Chonghwa Kim / 222
Case 8: Reduction crestal-alveoloplasty with sinus graft / Young-Ku Heo / 226
Case 9: Vertical alveolar ridge augmentation using a Ti-mesh SLA technique / Jung-Chul Park / 233
Case 10: Sinus membrane elevation of a complicated sinus septum area with vertical bone augmentation in severe defect area / Nam Yoon Michael Kim / 239


| Chapter 8 | Scientific Evidences for Predictability of the SCA/SLA Techniques, CMI Fixations, and Loading Protocols in the Posterior Maxilla

8-Year Retrospective Study on the SCA and SLA Techniques, and Sinus CMI Fixation and Loading Protocols in the Posterior Maxilla / 246
Early Loading of Splinted Implants Supporting a Two-unit Fixed Partial Denture in the Posterior Maxilla: 13-month Results from a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Two Different Implant Systems / 263
Retrospective Results of Implants for Partially Edentulous Posterior Jaws According to Time Points of Early Loading / 268
The In uence of Sinus Membrane Thickness Upon Membrane Perforation During Transcrestal Sinus Lift Procedure / 270
Incidence of and Factors Associated with Sinus Membrane Perforation During Sinus Augmentation Using the Reamer Drilling Approach: A Double-Center Case Series / 279
A New Technique for Minimally Invasive Maxillary Lateral Sinus Augmentation: a Case Report / 286
Sinus Bone Grafting Technique Using Special Reamers and Microelevators / 290
Differences in Implant Stability Associated with Various Methods of Preparation of the Implant Bed: An in Vitro Study / 294
Comparison of Surgical Techniques to Enhance Primary Stability in the Thin Crestal Cortical Bone and Low-density Bone / 297

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 81056049166

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 907 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Amazon Customer
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 5
Versatile Room Divider With Easy Assembly and Strong Coverage
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
I picked up this Siebwin 3-panel folding room divider mainly for privacy and room separation, and overall it works very well. Assembly is very straightforward, and the divider can be set up, taken apart, and stored without much effort. The fabric quality feels good, and the frame construction is stronger and more stable than expected. The support tubes especially feel well built and help keep the divider standing securely. One feature I really liked is the flexibility of the design. The panels can be used together as a complete divider or separated depending on the setup and available space. That makes it much more versatile for different room layouts or temporary privacy needs. The coverage is also very good, and the size matches the manufacturer’s description accurately. The fabric blocks light and background visibility well enough to provide solid privacy without feeling overly heavy. The wider feet also help improve stability compared to thinner folding dividers. Another positive detail is that everything arrived complete with no missing parts or damaged pieces, which made assembly much easier and faster. Compared to cheaper privacy screens, this one feels more durable and easier to customize depending on the situation. In terms of value for the money, it feels like a very practical and worthwhile purchase considering the size, flexibility, and build quality. Overall, a versatile and well-built room divider with easy assembly, strong privacy coverage, stable construction, complete included parts, flexible panel configuration, and excellent everyday functionality.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2026
F
Fred
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
Stable, flexible in deployment configuration, creates true privacy and looks great.
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
This is the second room divider panel I have installed, and there are several features about this one that I like much better than my older one. The fact that there are no gaps and that the material is thicker means you get more privacy or more hiding power, if you wish. My older divider has vertical spaces between each of the panels and the panels are half as wide as the Siebwin panels, so there are many vertical spaces. The Siebwin divider really creates privacy. Another feature that I really appreciate is that the legs are wider and stand off from the floor. On my older one the legs are flat and they're rather awkward to adjust because they create more drag on the floor. The feet on the older one also loosen if you turn them counter clockwise, so adjustments of configuration that require the feet to be moved are more complex. The older divider also must be deployed in a zig-zag fashion because he feet are not as wide, but this new one can be deployed and stable in a straight, an "N" shape or an arc. They are both the same length, but because the older one must be use in a zig-zag deployment it doesn't reach to the length of the new one. The Siebwin divider definitely costs more at $103.48, but it sports several features and advantages over the other brand, so it does a better job and is worth the extra cost.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026
C
Computer
Boise, US
★★★★★ 4
Easy to assemble, does the job, material is shiny nylon and shows creases, minor defects, sloppy
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W, Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
The Siebwin room divider is a good idea, and for the price, it mostly delivers on the intended functionality. I ordered the 12 foot, 3-panel version mainly to hide an unfinished basement storage area that had become an eyesore. It works well for that purpose and gives the space a cleaner appearance without spending the kind of money that more decorative dividers or custom partitions cost. If you need something temporary, portable, or mainly functional, this is a viable option. There are a few limitations that became obvious during setup and use. The first thing I noticed was that the weld quality on some of the metal poles is fairly sloppy. Once the cover is installed, you do not really see it, but up close, it does not look especially refined or professional. The blackout material also is not a matte canvas style fabric as I expected. It has more of a shiny nylon appearance, and the creases are fairly visible. Being that it’s more of a nylon, I’d be hesitant to try steaming it to remove the creases. However, the creases do not matter if you are using it in a basement, dorm, or shared room, but for photography, video work, or a professional office setting, the appearance could be disappointing. The fabric is thick enough, though. It blocks visibility well enough, but strong light behind it still shows through to some extent, nothing deal-breaking. Also, my fabric appeared to be slightly defective. The hook and loop strip on one of the bottom sections was off-center and couldn't be totally attached because it was lined up with one of the legs. I originally hoped to use this as a video backdrop, but I will probably end up replacing the fabric with a proper green screen or canvas material while continuing to use the frame itself. For now, it does a good job of covering my basement junk. Assembly was actually easier than I expected and took roughly 15 to 20 minutes. The longer vertical poles are tethered together similarly to tent poles, which made setup straightforward and fairly intuitive. The shorter horizontal pieces slide and snap together to the top and bottom of the vertical assembly. After each section is assembled, the divider panels connect together with metal plates and two knurled screws (at the top and bottom), so no tools are really required. A few screws were difficult to start because paint had gotten into the threads, but once they caught, they tightened down normally. The feet install with similar knurled fasteners and help keep the divider reasonably stable. One thing to watch for during setup is the fabric orientation. There is one arrow indicator in the middle of the fabric to indicate up. However, if you need another indicator, the smaller hook and loop strip goes on the bottom while the longer strip goes on top. I realized mine was upside down right before finishing and had to redo it. I wasn't difficult to redo, despite the defect in mine. The overall design is practical and easy to move around. I do like that the panels can fold and bend into different shapes depending on the space. The widened feet help stability, although when trying to stretch the fabric tight, I noticed the poles sometimes wanted to overlap slightly at the joints. Tightening everything helped somewhat, but it still happened occasionally. The divider feels adequate for normal indoor use, though I would not expect premium durability or luxury-level fit and finish at this price point. The entire device can also be easily disabled and stored in a tote if you need it completely out of the way. It comes with assembly instructions, but even if you didn’t have them, it’s easy to build without them (save a mistake or two). In terms of value, I think the Siebwin divider mostly matches its price. Around $100 gets you a large freestanding partition with decent usability and easy assembly, but there are compromises in materials, appearance, and refinement. The defects are also off-putting, but hopefully you won't have them. Higher-end room dividers can easily cost two or three times more, so some of the tradeoffs are expected. I also noticed cheaper alternatives online, but based on the quality here, I suspect those would probably have even more issues. For practical home use, temporary privacy, hiding storage areas, or separating shared spaces, this is a good option as long as expectations stay realistic.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2026
T
Trendy Tales
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 3
Works well but takes up more space than expected
Size: 2 Panel 8FT W, Size: 2 Panel 8FT W
This room divider does the job for creating a little extra privacy and was easy enough to set up. The panels feel decent quality and the wider feet help keep it more stable than some cheaper screens I’ve tried. My only issue is that it takes up a bit more room than I expected, especially with the feet sticking out. It’s still portable and folds away nicely, but definitely measure your space first. Overall it works well for separating a room or blocking off an area temporarily. i wish it came in other colors
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 26, 2026
K
Katrina Rhodes
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
Nice divider, serves it's purpose well!
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
This room divider worked out very well for what I needed. I wanted a simple way to create a little more privacy and separation in a larger room without doing anything permanent, and this divider was an easy solution. The panels provide good coverage, and the black color gives it a clean, modern appearance that blends in nicely with different décor styles. Assembly was fairly straightforward, and once set up, the wider feet helped keep the divider stable on the floor. I was especially happy with how flexible the panels are to arrange. You can keep it mostly straight, angle it around furniture, or create a more enclosed private space depending on the layout you need. The material allows light to filter through slightly while still offering a noticeable sense of privacy. I’ve used it for separating a workspace area, but it would also work well in bedrooms, apartments, dorms, studios, or shared living spaces. Another plus is that it can be folded and moved without too much effort when you want to change the setup. Overall, this divider delivers a good balance of functionality, portability, and appearance. It’s a practical option for anyone needing temporary room separation without installing permanent walls or curtains.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 26, 2026

recommand products

White Contemporary Round Bar Table
200.00
Cat Planter
40.00
"P" Cutout Letter Charm
137.50
Leopard Print Victorian Daybed
230.00
"Z" Cutout Letter Charm
137.50