Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 14 - Jul 19
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
NUP216-E-XL-M1-C3 FAGTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0167408310030 NUP216 E M1 C3 ueres Breitenma: 26 mm Gewicht: 1760 Gramm Herstellungsland: Auf Anfrage Innendurchmesser: 80 mm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 140,00 Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "9000. 0000" ueres Breitenmae: mm 26,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 26,00 C3 Internal Clearance Larger Than Normal E Increased Load Capacity ECLASS number 23 05 09 01 ECLASS2
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 0167408310030 NUP216-E-M1-C3 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 26 mm |
| Gewicht: 1760 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Auf Anfrage |
| Innendurchmesser: 80 mm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 140,00 |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "9000.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 26,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 26,00 |
| C3 Internal Clearance Larger Than Normal |
| E Increased Load Capacity |
| ECLASS number 23-05-09-01 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-09-01 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 1.76 |
| Innenmaße: mm 80,00 |
| Interne Radialluft C3 Innenluft (größer als Cn) |
| M1 Solid Brass Cage, Two Piece, Roller Guided |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 166000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 168000 |
| Referenzdrehzahl (n ϑr) "4200.0000" |
| XL X-Life |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 631 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great product
Size: 13.52 Fl Oz
Works great without drying your skin out. Used to use witch hazel and like this way better. Non greasy, and good for sensitive skin.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2026
★★★★★ 5
great for acne-prone and sensitive skin
Size: 13.52 Fl Oz
Simply the best makeup remover I have found for my sensitive skin and acne-prone. I use it to take my makeup off before Cerave cleanser for a super gentle double-cleanse, and it has significantly reduced my cystic acne breakouts.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026
★★★★★ 5
My fav
Size: 13.52 Fl Oz
My fav micellar water. Feels clean and my skin has been getting more clear after using
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Holy Grail Micellar Water
Size: 13.52 Fl Oz
This is my holy grail micellar water! My skin can be sensitive and reactive at times, and this product has never let me down. It has never irritated my eyes or skin. I use it to double cleanse, although sometimes I use only this micellar water followed by a quick splash of water. It does not leave a film and leaves my skin feeling nourished and happy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 24, 2025
★★★★★ 4
but takes quiet a good amount of cotton balls
Size: 6.8 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
It removes makeup alright, but takes quiet a good amount of cotton balls. Haven't try it on waterproof makeup yet, but it does make make skin feels clean and isn't harsh.
Edit: Tried it for a couple of days, and here's the verdict: It can remove makeup, but you'll need a good amount of it on a cotton pad, and likely you'll use more than one. It feels nice while it is on the face, though it clean best with light makeup, and it takes me a couple of cotton balls to clean eyeliner and mascara. I needed to use moisturizer after it, because it make my skin feels dry. It doesn't take long, and definitely save more time than washing with soap and water, but it's a little bit of a hassle, too. Oh well, at least it's very convenient.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 1, 2016